1. 01

    Define the professional audience

    Ask the practice which referring teams use the resource and what they need before contacting the office. Keep the scope specific. A page aimed at everyone may omit the practical detail a professional actually needs.

  2. 02

    Verify services and responsibilities

    Have the clinical team approve the scope described. Explain the next contact step without implying a clinical decision or promising that every referral will be appropriate. Distinguish general public education from case-specific communication.

  3. 03

    Check the handoff route

    Confirm the destination and the approved way to exchange any sensitive materials. A general marketing form should not become an improvised clinical intake system. Give public visitors clear instructions appropriate to that page.

  4. 04

    Keep the resource current

    Review contacts, service descriptions, and the process when the team changes. Test links without sending unsolicited messages or patient information. Record the person responsible for confirming the professional route.

A planning exercise, not a client result

Put the idea to work

Planning exercise: a referring office cannot tell whether to call a general number or use a separate established process. Clarify the approved route and the information needed to begin. The goal is a reliable handoff, not a public claim of exclusive referral relationships.

What to watch for

  • Unverified referral endorsements
  • Sensitive information requested through a general form
  • An outdated professional contact route

Make the next review concrete.

Use the worksheet to record your observations, the evidence behind them, and the decision you want to make. Keep unresolved assumptions visible until they are checked.

Open this site’s worksheet →